What the PCC does:
- Independent body
- Deals with complaints about editorial content of magazines/newspapers and their websites
- 16 clause Code of Practice to which editors/journalists must adhere
- Investigates complaints from people with belief code has been breached
- Acts as mediator between editor and complainant to find resolution (e.g. apology, public correction, clarification), seeking 'sufficient remedial action'
- If case isn't resolved simply, PCC assesses evidence in an adjudication, reasoning whether to uphold or reject complaint
- Not legal or government run
- Voluntary agreement of newspaper/magazine to be regulated by independent body
- Code of Practice drawn up by editors
- Commission run by majority public ('lay') members (10/17 including chairman)
- Covers 4 main areas - accuracy, privacy, news gathering & protecting the vulnerable
- Editor expected to take responsibility for stories/photographs complying with the code
- Editor can defend publication and its behaviour as 'in public interest'
- Doesn't cover issues of taste/decency as in democracy publications should be free to choose style
- Understands individuals choose to look at a newspaper and can make their own decisions
- Contrasts to more public mediums (e.g. billboards) may be ruled inappropriate on taste
- Through body called 'Press Standards Board of Finance' (PressBof) who are responsible for collecting money from newspapers/magazines in UK
- Press agreed to pay amount in proportion to no. of readers in circulation
- No public/government funding
- Set up in 1991, replacing Press Council
- In 1980s, a small no. of publications failed to observe basic ethics of journalism leading to MPs loss in confidence in Press Council
- Government then appointed Calcutt to consider "measures needed to give protection to individual privacy...improving recourse of press for citizens"
- House of Commons Culture, Media & Sport select committee concluded "non-statutory regulation can work effectively"
- Belief employed that self regulation prevents authoritarianism and undermining democracy
- Anyone who believes an article involving them breaches the Code
- 1.5% came from those in public eye, 95.8% from general public (2007)
- Special protection to vulnerable groups (e.g. children, hospital patients)
- Majority of complaints about regional newspapers
- In a democracy the press shouldn't be stringently controlled by law/government
- Maintains democracy as it is independent and voluntary
- Doesn't allow free from accountability - wrongs must be righted
- PCC committed to protecting public by ensuring broken rules are resolved asap
- Fast - deals with complaints in average of 35 days
- Free - costs nothing to use service
- Fair - independent from industry it was set up to regulate
No comments:
Post a Comment